VMBox VPS 2 (NL)

About

VMBox is an established provider and launched in 2011. They were originally based in the United Kingdom but the brand and assets of VMBox were acquired by QuickPacket in November 2018. QuickPacket was founded in June 2003 and has datacenters based in Charlotte, NC, Los Angeles, CA, Chicago, IL, Amsterdam, NL and Manchester, UK. You can find out more about QuickPacket here.

Details

Provider

Provider VMBox
Established2011
Product NameVPS 2
Virtulization OVZ
DatacentreSingle Hop
LocationAmsterdam, Holland
Price$20.00/y

Server

CPU2 vCore
RAM 2GB
SWAP None
Storage 50GB
Disk TypeHDD (SSD Cached)
Bandwidth2TB
Network Speed1Gbit Port
IPv4 Included1
IPv6 Included/64
Control PanelSolus VM

Benchmarks

bench.sh

----------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU model            : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz
Number of cores      : 2
CPU frequency        : 2101.000 MHz
Total size of Disk   : 50.0 GB (0.7 GB Used)
Total amount of Mem  : 2048 MB (10 MB Used)
Total amount of Swap : 0 MB (0 MB Used)
System uptime        : 0 days, 0 hour 22 min
Load average         : 0.00, 0.09, 0.09
OS                   : CentOS 7.6.1810
Arch                 : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel               : 2.6.32-042stab127.2
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O speed(1st run)   : 147 MB/s
I/O speed(2nd run)   : 187 MB/s
I/O speed(3rd run)   : 176 MB/s
Average I/O speed    : 170.0 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name                       IPv4 address            Download Speed
CacheFly                        205.234.175.175         87.6MB/s      
Linode, Tokyo, JP               106.187.96.148          8.81MB/s      
Linode, Singapore, SG           139.162.23.4            8.58MB/s      
Linode, London, UK              176.58.107.39           64.9MB/s      
Linode, Frankfurt, DE           139.162.130.8           88.7MB/s      
Linode, Fremont, CA             50.116.14.9             14.5MB/s      
Softlayer, Dallas, TX           173.192.68.18           18.5MB/s      
Softlayer, Seattle, WA          67.228.112.250          11.9MB/s      
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE        159.122.69.4            80.1MB/s      
Softlayer, Singapore, SG        119.81.28.170           11.8MB/s      
Softlayer, HongKong, CN         119.81.130.170          8.53MB/s      
----------------------------------------------------------------------

nench.sh

-------------------------------------------------
 nench.sh v2019.03.01 -- https://git.io/nench.sh
 benchmark timestamp:    2019-06-09 07:38:41 UTC
-------------------------------------------------

Processor:    Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz
CPU cores:    2
Frequency:    2101.000 MHz
RAM:          2.0G
Swap:         -
Kernel:       Linux 2.6.32-042stab127.2 x86_64

Disks:
Filesystem     Type      Size Inodes
/dev/simfs     simfs      50G    25M

CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
    2.596 seconds
CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
    
ioping: seek rate
    min/avg/max/mdev = 37.0 us / 49.2 us / 17.4 ms / 65.1 us
ioping: sequential read speed
    generated 17.3 k requests in 5.00 s, 4.23 GiB, 3.46 k iops, 865.8 MiB/s

dd: sequential write speed
    1st run:    196.46 MiB/s
    2nd run:    202.18 MiB/s
    3rd run:    238.42 MiB/s
    average:    212.35 MiB/s

IPv4 speedtests
    your IPv4:    107.xxx.xxx.xxx

    Cachefly CDN:         87.28 MiB/s
    Leaseweb (NL):        31.22 MiB/s
    Softlayer DAL (US):   16.84 MiB/s
    Online.net (FR):      95.30 MiB/s
    OVH BHS (CA):         15.42 MiB/s

IPv6 speedtests
    your IPv6:    2a07:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx

    Leaseweb (NL):        8.18 MiB/s
    Softlayer DAL (US):   0.00 MiB/s
    Online.net (FR):      5.27 MiB/s
    OVH BHS (CA):         2.16 MiB/s
-------------------------------------------------

bench.monster

COMING SOON

Yet Another Bench Script (YABS)

COMING SOON

CPU Flags

flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf cpuid_faulting pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid dca sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm ida arat epb pln pts dtherm tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase smep erms xsaveopt

FIO / Sequential Write

fio-3.1
Starting 1 process
myjob: Laying out IO file (1 file / 15360MiB)
Jobs: 1 (f=1): [W(1)][100.0%][r=0KiB/s,w=394MiB/s][r=0,w=3155 IOPS][eta 00m:00s]
myjob: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=1920: Sun Jun  9 07:47:19 2019
  write: IOPS=2226, BW=278MiB/s (292MB/s)(15.0GiB/55197msec)
    slat (usec): min=101, max=1268.4k, avg=444.79, stdev=8904.77
    clat (usec): min=10, max=1289.0k, avg=13925.83, stdev=53757.48
     lat (usec): min=328, max=1289.2k, avg=14371.30, stdev=54719.91
    clat percentiles (msec):
     |  1.00th=[    5],  5.00th=[    5], 10.00th=[    5], 20.00th=[    5],
     | 30.00th=[    6], 40.00th=[    6], 50.00th=[    7], 60.00th=[    7],
     | 70.00th=[    7], 80.00th=[    8], 90.00th=[   10], 95.00th=[   22],
     | 99.00th=[  255], 99.50th=[  405], 99.90th=[  718], 99.95th=[ 1028],
     | 99.99th=[ 1267]
   bw (  KiB/s): min= 2304, max=784896, per=100.00%, avg=292014.36, stdev=210420.41, samples=107
   iops        : min=   18, max= 6132, avg=2281.33, stdev=1643.91, samples=107
  lat (usec)   : 20=0.01%, 500=0.01%, 750=0.01%
  lat (msec)   : 2=0.01%, 4=0.36%, 10=90.50%, 20=3.98%, 50=1.89%
  lat (msec)   : 100=0.97%, 250=1.25%, 500=0.74%, 750=0.20%, 1000=0.04%
  lat (msec)   : 2000=0.05%
  cpu          : usr=2.50%, sys=39.75%, ctx=92098, majf=0, minf=26
  IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=100.0%, >=64=0.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.1%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     issued rwt: total=0,122880,0, short=0,0,0, dropped=0,0,0
     latency   : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=32

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
  WRITE: bw=278MiB/s (292MB/s), 278MiB/s-278MiB/s (292MB/s-292MB/s), io=15.0GiB (16.1GB), run=55197-55197msec

FIO / Sequential Read

fio-3.1
Starting 1 process
Jobs: 1 (f=1): [R(1)][100.0%][r=390MiB/s,w=0KiB/s][r=3121,w=0 IOPS][eta 00m:00s]
myjob: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=1925: Sun Jun  9 07:48:32 2019
   read: IOPS=2231, BW=279MiB/s (292MB/s)(15.0GiB/55075msec)
    slat (usec): min=22, max=85417, avg=411.90, stdev=1630.36
    clat (usec): min=8, max=123861, avg=12898.41, stdev=10612.65
     lat (usec): min=67, max=123915, avg=13310.90, stdev=10783.90
    clat percentiles (msec):
     |  1.00th=[    5],  5.00th=[    6], 10.00th=[    7], 20.00th=[    7],
     | 30.00th=[    8], 40.00th=[    8], 50.00th=[    8], 60.00th=[    8],
     | 70.00th=[   14], 80.00th=[   21], 90.00th=[   26], 95.00th=[   32],
     | 99.00th=[   54], 99.50th=[   68], 99.90th=[   95], 99.95th=[  113],
     | 99.99th=[  122]
   bw (  KiB/s): min=35584, max=470016, per=100.00%, avg=304672.72, stdev=86289.43, samples=103
   iops        : min=  278, max= 3672, avg=2380.23, stdev=674.12, samples=103
  lat (usec)   : 10=0.01%, 100=0.01%, 250=0.01%, 1000=0.01%
  lat (msec)   : 2=0.01%, 4=0.22%, 10=67.14%, 20=11.75%, 50=19.57%
  lat (msec)   : 100=1.23%, 250=0.08%
  cpu          : usr=0.93%, sys=31.20%, ctx=49867, majf=0, minf=1058
  IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=100.0%, >=64=0.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.1%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     issued rwt: total=122880,0,0, short=0,0,0, dropped=0,0,0
     latency   : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=32

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
   READ: bw=279MiB/s (292MB/s), 279MiB/s-279MiB/s (292MB/s-292MB/s), io=15.0GiB (16.1GB), run=55075-55075msec
Just Benchmarks

By Just Benchmarks

Our aim is to test the performance of Virtual Private Servers (VPS), looking at providers who give the best value for money. Our mission is to measure CPU power, disk IO speed and network speed and report the results in a way that enables you to make comparisons between them.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.