HostSolutions Storage VPS 1TB (RO)

About

HostSolutions is an established provider who launched in 1996. They are based in Oradea, Romania and one of the few providers featured who run their own datacenter. There datacenter is equipped with HP and Dell servers and utilise redundant internet connections with the biggest providers in Romania. Their mantra is – Your business and your objectives are unique. Your hosting provider should be unique as well. You can find out more about HostSolutions here.

Details

Provider

Provider HostSolutions
Established1996
Product NameStorage VPS
Virtulization OVZ
Datacentre Own (HostSolutions)
LocationOradea, Romania
Price$30.80/y

Server

CPU1 vCore
RAM 1GB
SWAP 128MB
Storage 1TB
Disk TypeHDD
Bandwidth 10TB
Network Speed1Gbit Port
IPv4 Included1
IPv6 IncludedNone
Control Panel WHMCS

Benchmarks

bench.sh

----------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU model            : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2450L 0 @ 1.80GHz
Number of cores      : 1
CPU frequency        : 1795.764 MHz
Total size of Disk   : 1024.0 GB (0.6 GB Used)
Total amount of Mem  : 1024 MB (6 MB Used)
Total amount of Swap : 128 MB (28 MB Used)
System uptime        : 3 days, 18 hour 9 min
Load average         : 0.00, 0.03, 0.06
OS                   : CentOS 7.6.1810
Arch                 : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel               : 2.6.32-48-pve
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O speed(1st run)   : 200 MB/s
I/O speed(2nd run)   : 170 MB/s
I/O speed(3rd run)   : 151 MB/s
Average I/O speed    : 173.7 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name                       IPv4 address            Download Speed
CacheFly                        205.234.175.175         19.0MB/s      
Linode, Tokyo, JP               106.187.96.148          6.73MB/s      
Linode, Singapore, SG           139.162.23.4            943KB/s       
Linode, London, UK              176.58.107.39           2.13MB/s      
Linode, Frankfurt, DE           139.162.130.8           23.0MB/s      
Linode, Fremont, CA             50.116.14.9             1.26MB/s      
Softlayer, Dallas, TX           173.192.68.18           1.68MB/s      
Softlayer, Seattle, WA          67.228.112.250          968KB/s       
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE        159.122.69.4            3.87MB/s      
Softlayer, Singapore, SG        119.81.28.170           1.46MB/s      
Softlayer, HongKong, CN         119.81.130.170          1.11MB/s      
----------------------------------------------------------------------

nench.sh

-------------------------------------------------
 nench.sh v2019.06.29 -- https://git.io/nench.sh
 benchmark timestamp:    2019-07-01 11:18:34 UTC
-------------------------------------------------

Processor:    Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2450L 0 @ 1.80GHz
CPU cores:    1
Frequency:    1795.764 MHz
RAM:          1.0G
Swap:         128M
Kernel:       Linux 2.6.32-48-pve x86_64

Disks:
Filesystem     Type      Size Inodes
/dev/simfs     simfs     1.0T   196M

CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
    3.863 seconds
CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
    CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
    
ioping: seek rate
    min/avg/max/mdev = 32.3 us / 64.0 us / 6.76 ms / 221.3 us
ioping: sequential read speed
    generated 16.8 k requests in 5.00 s, 4.11 GiB, 3.36 k iops, 840.9 MiB/s

dd: sequential write speed
    1st run:    241.28 MiB/s
    2nd run:    222.21 MiB/s
    3rd run:    267.98 MiB/s
    average:    243.82 MiB/s

IPv4 speedtests
    your IPv4:    193.xxx.xxx.xxx

    Cachefly CDN:         20.16 MiB/s
    Leaseweb (NL):        3.37 MiB/s
    Softlayer DAL (US):   3.15 MiB/s
    Online.net (FR):      7.46 MiB/s
    OVH BHS (CA):         3.70 MiB/s

No IPv6 connectivity detected
-------------------------------------------------

bench.monster

COMING SOON

Yet Another Bench Script (YABS)

COMING SOON

CPU Flags

flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid dca sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx lahf_lm ida arat epb pln pts dtherm tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid xsaveopt

FIO / Sequential Write

fio-3.1
Starting 1 process
myjob: Laying out IO file (1 file / 15360MiB)
Jobs: 1 (f=1): [W(1)][100.0%][r=0KiB/s,w=84.1MiB/s][r=0,w=673 IOPS][eta 00m:00s]
myjob: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=1964: Mon Jul  1 13:04:32 2019
  write: IOPS=1690, BW=211MiB/s (222MB/s)(15.0GiB/72690msec)
    slat (usec): min=139, max=2200.9k, avg=584.92, stdev=11031.70
    clat (usec): min=8, max=2223.1k, avg=18338.84, stdev=61958.30
     lat (usec): min=263, max=2223.3k, avg=18925.52, stdev=62947.32
    clat percentiles (msec):
     |  1.00th=[    6],  5.00th=[    7], 10.00th=[    8], 20.00th=[    9],
     | 30.00th=[   10], 40.00th=[   12], 50.00th=[   13], 60.00th=[   15],
     | 70.00th=[   17], 80.00th=[   21], 90.00th=[   24], 95.00th=[   26],
     | 99.00th=[   74], 99.50th=[  144], 99.90th=[ 1351], 99.95th=[ 1787],
     | 99.99th=[ 2198]
   bw (  KiB/s): min=15515, max=741215, per=100.00%, avg=233438.24, stdev=95351.95, samples=135
   iops        : min=  121, max= 5790, avg=1823.26, stdev=744.88, samples=135
  lat (usec)   : 10=0.01%, 500=0.01%, 750=0.01%, 1000=0.01%
  lat (msec)   : 2=0.01%, 4=0.01%, 10=31.96%, 20=47.73%, 50=18.13%
  lat (msec)   : 100=1.38%, 250=0.38%, 500=0.28%, 750=0.01%, 1000=0.03%
  lat (msec)   : 2000=0.08%, >=2000=0.03%
  cpu          : usr=4.40%, sys=42.04%, ctx=50401, majf=0, minf=48662
  IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=100.0%, >=64=0.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.1%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     issued rwt: total=0,122880,0, short=0,0,0, dropped=0,0,0
     latency   : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=32

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
  WRITE: bw=211MiB/s (222MB/s), 211MiB/s-211MiB/s (222MB/s-222MB/s), io=15.0GiB (16.1GB), run=72690-72690msec

FIO / Sequential Read

fio-3.1
Starting 1 process
Jobs: 1 (f=1): [R(1)][100.0%][r=229MiB/s,w=0KiB/s][r=1830,w=0 IOPS][eta 00m:00s]
myjob: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=2045: Mon Jul  1 13:11:05 2019
   read: IOPS=1461, BW=183MiB/s (192MB/s)(15.0GiB/84090msec)
    slat (usec): min=30, max=340104, avg=645.44, stdev=3558.76
    clat (usec): min=5, max=681421, avg=20203.90, stdev=24383.51
     lat (usec): min=69, max=681538, avg=20851.31, stdev=24857.58
    clat percentiles (msec):
     |  1.00th=[    6],  5.00th=[   11], 10.00th=[   16], 20.00th=[   16],
     | 30.00th=[   17], 40.00th=[   17], 50.00th=[   18], 60.00th=[   18],
     | 70.00th=[   18], 80.00th=[   18], 90.00th=[   20], 95.00th=[   26],
     | 99.00th=[  124], 99.50th=[  176], 99.90th=[  351], 99.95th=[  405],
     | 99.99th=[  609]
   bw (  KiB/s): min= 4096, max=247808, per=100.00%, avg=196282.09, stdev=53189.26, samples=160
   iops        : min=   32, max= 1936, avg=1533.38, stdev=415.53, samples=160
  lat (usec)   : 10=0.01%, 100=0.01%, 250=0.01%, 750=0.01%, 1000=0.01%
  lat (msec)   : 2=0.01%, 4=0.06%, 10=4.31%, 20=87.50%, 50=5.15%
  lat (msec)   : 100=1.45%, 250=1.24%, 500=0.25%, 750=0.03%
  cpu          : usr=0.82%, sys=29.24%, ctx=70211, majf=0, minf=71690
  IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=100.0%, >=64=0.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.1%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     issued rwt: total=122880,0,0, short=0,0,0, dropped=0,0,0
     latency   : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=32

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
   READ: bw=183MiB/s (192MB/s), 183MiB/s-183MiB/s (192MB/s-192MB/s), io=15.0GiB (16.1GB), run=84090-84090msec
Just Benchmarks

By Just Benchmarks

Our aim is to test the performance of Virtual Private Servers (VPS), looking at providers who give the best value for money. Our mission is to measure CPU power, disk IO speed and network speed and report the results in a way that enables you to make comparisons between them.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.